If a trade-off relationship exists between the two attributes X and Y, that alone is not a basis for concluding that “X and Y need to be balanced”
If the utility function is a linear sum, the maximum value is always at the end Limitedly valid if and only if it is convex with respect to the origin
- [[The point is balance.]]
Disruptive innovation can occur even if technology progresses gradually
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/トレードオフは「要はバランス」の根拠にならない using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.